Introduce qlty #35
Introduce qlty #35
Conversation
Umekawa
requested review from
Copilot and
getty104
and removed request for
a team
Summary of ChangesHello @Umekawa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates 'qlty' into the project's continuous integration pipeline to provide up-to-date metrics on code coverage and maintainability. This change is crucial for maintaining code quality standards, especially after the deprecation of the Code Climate API. The integration ensures that these vital statistics are automatically calculated and prominently displayed in the project's README, offering immediate visibility into the codebase's health. Highlights
Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR migrates from Code Climate to qlty for code coverage tracking and maintainability metrics. The changes implement JSON coverage output and integrate qlty's coverage reporting workflow.
- Added simplecov_json_formatter dependency and configured dual output (JSON + HTML)
- Implemented qlty coverage action in CI workflow
- Updated README badges to display qlty maintainability and coverage metrics
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| spec/spec_helper.rb | Configured SimpleCov to output both JSON and HTML formats with spec filtering |
| ruboty-github.gemspec | Added simplecov_json_formatter as development dependency |
| README.md | Updated badges to use qlty instead of Code Climate |
| .github/workflows/test.yml | Added qlty job for coverage upload using coverage.json output |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces qlty for code coverage and maintainability metrics, replacing the now-disabled Code Climate integration. The changes correctly add the simplecov_json_formatter dependency, configure simplecov to output JSON reports, and update the README with new badges. The implementation is solid. I have a couple of minor suggestions to improve formatting and readability.
Umekawa
force-pushed
the
introduce-qlty
branch
from
a62f3ce to
3860fd8
Compare
Umekawa
force-pushed
the
introduce-qlty
branch
from
3860fd8 to
fefed12
Compare
What
How
simplecov_json_formatterWhy
REF